<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bloggo ergo sum &#187; science-movies-technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggoergosum.com/tag/science-movies-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggoergosum.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 worst top 10 lists?</title>
		<link>http://bloggoergosum.com/2006/09/25/top-10-worst-top-10-lists/</link>
		<comments>http://bloggoergosum.com/2006/09/25/top-10-worst-top-10-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-movies-technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggoergosum.us/2006/09/25/top-10-worst-top-10-lists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This list at gideontech.com is stupid.&#160; I like a good top ten list, particularly the geeky kind like &#8220;Top 10 worst portrayals of technology in Film&#8221;, but this one is anything but.&#160; The summarized list, with abbreviated explanations of why each movie is on the list: 10. Wargames (1983) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;the idea of a computer <a href="http://bloggoergosum.com/2006/09/25/top-10-worst-top-10-lists/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gideontech.com/content/articles/326/1">This list</a> at gideontech.com is stupid.&nbsp; I like a good top ten list, particularly the geeky kind like &#8220;Top 10 worst portrayals of technology in Film&#8221;, but this one is anything but.&nbsp; The summarized list, with abbreviated explanations of why each movie is on the list:</p>
<blockquote><p>10. <i>Wargames </i>(1983) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;the idea of a computer talking to you after you &#8216;hack&#8217; into it is laughable in this day an age.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is just ignorant.&nbsp; Firstly, the computer &#8220;talked&#8221; because Broderick&#8217;s character had a voice synthesizer attached to his computer.&nbsp; My grandmother had one of those built into a little digital clock before I was born.&nbsp; Secondly, he didn&#8217;t really &#8220;hack&#8221; into a NORAD system with technical wizardry like this article implies.&nbsp; In the movie, the character (I forget his name) was simply dialing phone numbers to see what he could find.&nbsp; Given that the internet was not &#8220;available&#8221; as they put it, it&#8217;s conceivable that NORAD didn&#8217;t properly defend some computers.&nbsp; This one definitely doesn&#8217;t belong on this list.</p>
<blockquote><p>9. <i>The Italian Job</i> (2003) &#8211; &#8220;So since his P2P file sharing program got stolen, Seth now makes a wire fram program that follows a Mini around perfectly through walls?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Again (this lead-off will get old), the criticism is just dumb.&nbsp; What&#8217;s dumber: portraying a character that wrote both a P2P file-sharing program and a 3D modeling program that can track a vehicle, or assuming that there is nobody that could do both?</p>
<blockquote><p>8. <i>Antitrust </i>(2001) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;<span id="intelliTXT">One scene that jumps right out is the ability for the security team to lift code off a computer screen via a security camera.&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />This is extra lame &#8211; is there any special reason why you <u>couldn&#8217;t</u> see code on a monitor by viewing it with a security camera?&nbsp; The NSA can do things like see the contents being displayed on a monitor from inside a van outside the building where the monitor is located.&nbsp; This item is simply anti-creative.</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">7. <i>Hackers </i>(1995) &#8211; &#8220;fly-through sequences of a supercomputer&#8221;?</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />I haven&#8217;t seen this one, but the &#8220;rediculous fly-through sequences of the supercomputer&#8221; could have just been a visualization.&nbsp; Given that petroleum companies actually use supercomputers for exploratory techniques involving visualization, the idea isn&#8217;t so far-fetched, even if it&#8217;s unrealistic.</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">6. <i>Transporter </i>(2005) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;</span><span id="intelliTXT">he looks up a criminal on the computer. Within a<br />
few seconds, that information is magically beamed to Frank&#8217;s car. How<br />
in the world did they sync up? How did the computer at the police<br />
station know where Frank was?&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />Yes, it&#8217;s a little fantastic that a retired investigator from France could just hop on an FBI database and &#8220;magically beam&#8221; the information he found to a mobile system somewhere.&nbsp; However, you don&#8217;t have to be terribly creative to imagine how this might work.&nbsp; What if Frank&#8217;s car simply had a mobile phone system that tied into a telephony server?&nbsp; Then one would only have to send data to an IP address &#8211; not implausable &#8211; and the telephony server could take care of the rest.&nbsp; A simple FTP tranfer could have occurred.&nbsp; They didn&#8217;t have to &#8220;sync up&#8221;, and the computer at the police station didn&#8217;t have to &#8220;know&#8221; where Frank was &#8211; that&#8217;s what routers and telephony servers are for.</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">5. <i>Swordfish </i>(2001) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;</span><span id="intelliTXT">worms and viruses looked like little gems&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />Good grief.&nbsp; This is their complaint?&nbsp; One can visualize many things in many different ways.&nbsp; The Linux kernel has been graphically visualized too, for crying-out-loud.&nbsp; </p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">4. <i>Goldeneye </i>(1995) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;</span><span id="intelliTXT">the lamest evil hacker to date, Boris. With the ability to &#8216;spike&#8217; remote computer systems&#8230;&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />Huh?&nbsp; Ok, so he was a lame character.&nbsp; But what&#8217;s wrong here?&nbsp; Why can&#8217;t he &#8216;spike&#8217; remote computer systems?&nbsp; What if DDoS attacks were called &#8216;spiking&#8217; instead of DDoS?</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">3. <i>Mission Impossible</i> (1996) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;</span><span id="intelliTXT">Ethan Hunt decides to start emailing people out<br />
of the blue it seems. The emails he tries are not even formatted<br />
correctly. Also, his un-canny ability to find information through<br />
graphical newsgroups is something else.&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />Must we do this again?&nbsp; Can this list really be as contrived as it seems?&nbsp; Anyway, the email addresses aren&#8217;t &#8220;formatted correctly&#8221;.&nbsp; Ehem&#8230;*cough* AOL *cough*.&nbsp; But what about the &#8220;graphical newsgroups&#8221;?&nbsp; Did he mean to say &#8220;websites with pictures&#8221;?&nbsp; Huh.&nbsp; My ability to find information on pages like that is pretty uncanny too.</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">2. <i>Jurassic Park</i> (1993) &#8211; &#8220;</span><span id="intelliTXT">Where on this planet is there a 10 year old girl who knows and can understand UNIX?!?&#8221;</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />Of all the far-fetched nonsense on this movie, and his complaint is based on the assumption that no 10-year-old girl can possibly know UNIX?&nbsp; Give me a break.&nbsp; By the time my daughter is 10, she&#8217;ll have forgotten more UNIX than this retard ever knew.</p>
<p></span><br />
<blockquote><span id="intelliTXT">1. <i>Firewall </i>(2006) &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;</span><span id="intelliTXT">is the dumbest and non-believable use of an iPod to date&#8221;.</span><br /><span id="intelliTXT"></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="intelliTXT"><br />This is probably the worst of the movies on this list, but that isn&#8217;t saying much. So, let&#8217;s break this one down: Ford takes an iPod (essentially a hard drive with a good-sized LCD and a microcontroller) and stores textual data that came from a scanner and was processed by an OCR program on it.&nbsp; Then he takes this little hard drive and uses it to dump data back out to a wire-transfer terminal.&nbsp; Big whoop.&nbsp; In no way is this implausible.&nbsp; The only implausible part is that A) Apple doesn&#8217;t release their hardware specs, and B) he did it in less than 12 hours.</p>
<p>This list was completely lame.</p>
<p>What about <i>Enemy of the State</i>, in which a satellite is used to peer through Will Smith&#8217;s body into a bag he was holding inside a lengerie store?&nbsp; How about just about any Sci-Fi film that deals with space travel, or wormholes, or energy weapons, etc?<br /></span></p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">powered by <a href="http://performancing.com/firefox">performancing firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bloggoergosum.com/2006/09/25/top-10-worst-top-10-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

